My first day observing Chinook and Kalluk came chock-full with several moments of awe. The first was upon getting a good look at Kalluk. He’s a young male, less than half of giant panda Gao Gao’s age, and yet the size difference between them is astonishing. Kalluk, as a representative of the largest bear species on the planet, is a towering hulk. Despite his lean frame, I am told he weighs in excess of 850 pounds, or 380 kilograms (compare that to Gao Gao’s mere 160-pound, or 70-kilogram, weight). Resting on his backside in an erect seated posture, he is taller than I am. And when he stands on his rear legs to get a look at something placed up high…well, even NBA stars would have a run for their money looking big next to Kalluk.
I have spent most of my time over the last few years working with the (not so?) giant panda and the sun bear, the two smallest living bears. What factors might account for the great difference in size that we see in the spectrum from these smallish bears to the massive polar and brown bear species? One major contributing factor is the different environmental niches that these species inhabit.
The largest bears are cold weather animals, living in harsh, extreme climates much of the year. Coping mechanisms to deal with cold and its resultant food shortages include hibernation periods, insulating fat deposits to keep the heat in, and (in the case of the polar bear) translucent hairs which aid in conducting sunlight down to the skin to increase heat absorption. But increased size is also a fundamental way of coping with coldness, as the basic principle of surface-to-volume ratios indicates: the larger the body, the smaller the surface area relative to body volume. This reduced surface area ratio allows for a lower rate of heat loss.
Compared to the harsh, cold climates polar bears inhabit, sun bears enjoy warm, tropical habitats. The steamy rain forests from Borneo to Thailand and India were the birthing grounds of this species, and the bear benefited from a smaller size to aid in rapid dissipation of heat to avoid thermostress. But what about pandas? Don’t they typically inhabit snowy, cold mountain passes more closely resembling the habitat of a larger brown bear? Why aren’t they so large?
One answer to this question lies in the evolutionary history of the panda. Long before man came to be so populous in China, pandas could readily be found in the lowlands of southeastern China, at about 1,600 feet (500 meters) above sea level. The panda populations probably expanded and contracted in range many times as the temperature alternately warmed and cooled, with warm weather allowing expansion due to the increasingly favorable conditions for bamboo growth in warm seasons. Thus, at some points in the panda’s evolutionary history, this ancient bear species enjoyed warmer climates and survived well with a smaller size.
Of course, the question of size differences among bears is more complicated than the surface-to-volume picture I have sketched here, but it does provide a partial answer to the wide variety of sizes achieved across the eight living bear species. It even explains some of the differences seen between subspecies, such as the discrepancy between the warm summering grizzly populations relative to their colder cousins, the big Kodiak brown bear. Next time you have a chance to visit your local zoo and observe the bears housed there, maybe you will see their body sizes in a whole new light!
Suzanne Hall is a senior research technician with the San Diego Zoo’s Giant Panda Unit.